Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Nashville''s English-only measure defeated Options · View
admin
Posted: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:02:37 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration

Joined: 8/12/2008
Posts: 3,600
Points: -3,987
No one predicted the massive turnout on the special election, one that inspired strong emotion from voters on either side. Ultimately, opponents said, the message that diversity is a good thing came through.
""""With the defeat of this amendment, the citizens of Nashville tell the rest of the country that we are an incredibly warm city with an entrepreneurial spirit,"""" said Tom Oreck, a vacuum cleaner company owner who worked to defeat the measure.

The final was 32,144 for English only and 41,752 against — at about 19 percent, the largest turnout for a special election in a decade. Opponents were well ahead when early voting totals came out just after the polls closed at 7 p.m. and never trailed.

The measure would have forced all Metro Nashville government business to be done in English, with the council allowed to vote on exceptions. The city''s legal department contended early on that conflicts with federal law would enmesh Nashville in litigation for years to come.

By defeating the measure, Nashville will not be the largest city in the nation with an English-only rule in its charter despite dogged efforts by Metro Councilman Eric Crafton, who spearheaded the amendment. The city''s size attracted the attention of national media.
Crafton''s arguments

Crafton and his Nashville English First group argued that the city would save money in translation services and become unified as the result of more immigrants learning English.

But even Crafton said he is glad the special election is over. He has been trying to get the charter amended for two years, first failing after former Mayor Bill Purcell vetoed a council vote on the issue and then failing to get it on the November ballot over a technicality in timing.

""""Like Roberto Duran said after his fight, ''No mas,''"""" Crafton said. """"I think our community benefited from this debate, and I''m glad to have it behind us. We may have been on different sides, but we have to work to improve the education system, work through the budget crisis. Now, we have to be cooperative and work together.""""

After the final tallies, Mayor Karl Dean also called for the city to move on from this chapter.

""""The results of this special election reaffirm Nashville''s identity as a welcoming and friendly city and our ability to come together as a community — from all walks of life and perspectives — to work together for a common cause for the good of our city,"""" he said.
Election costs

Even some who voted for the measure complained about the expense of holding a special election for it — nearly $280,000. Others didn''t like the expense or the measure.

""""This is a waste of taxpayer money,"""" said Ruth Hall, who voted at DuPont Tyler Middle School. """"It''s wrong, and I voted against it.

""""If I travel somewhere, I don''t want the government telling me what I should be speaking and when.""""

But those who went to the polls had ideas as diverse as Nashville itself. Julie Lopez, who is married to a Cuban immigrant and adopted a daughter from Colombia, voted in favor of the measure.

""""I just feel that it''s fine to have government business to be in one language, an official language,"""" said Lopez, who voted at the Central Pike Church of Christ. """"I think, with changing demographics, there should be changing policies.""""

Overall, the """"one country, one language"""" sentiment pushed by Crafton to galvanize voters didn''t resonate because Nashville is becoming cosmopolitan and comfortable with its diversity, said University of Illinois professor Dennis Baron, who has written extensively on English-only measures.

""""Nashville refused to be alarmed by unwarranted language endangerment,"""" he said. """"This is a good sign. As I''ve said, these things tend to pass. The forces against the measure worked very hard.""""

Baron said English-only measures are often veiled attempts against immigrants and non-English speaking groups. The argument over English-only found itself framed around Latinos and illegal immigration, but it also would have affected the thousands of refugees the federal government resettles in Nashville.

The defeat of English-only is a sign that voters recognize bad policy, said Maria Rodriguez, director of the Florida Immigrant Coalition who has fought against similar measures in that state.

""""Voters are not duped anymore,"""" she said. """"They know when they see bad policy that is going to be costly and that''s not progressive. … I guess brown can stick around in Nashville.

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20090123/NEWS0202/901230395/1001/RSS01

Be sure to check out the rest of FIRE Coalition at: http://www.FIRECoalition.com

FIRE Coalition Blog: http://www.FIRECoalition.com/blog

FIRE Coailtion Projects: http://www.FIRECoalition.com/projects
AmericansFirst
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2009 4:11:55 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 1/5/2009
Posts: 521
Points: 586
Location: New Richmond, Ohio
Nashville rejects English-only measure

Opponents feared the change would put up a 'go away' sign in the city where 1 in 10 residents are foreign born and international businesses keep the economy humming.

By Richard Fausset
January 23, 2009
Reporting from Atlanta --


Modern-day Nashville is a city that thrives as much on global trade as it does on its trademark twang.

So for many business and government leaders, it was a great relief Thursday night when voters rejected a ballot measure that would have limited local government to conducting its business in English.

The proposal sparked debates familiar to many American communities -- about the need for immigrants to learn English, for example, and the cost of translation services in a community where as many as 1 in 10 residents are foreign-born.

But opponents also focused heavily on the damage the measure could do to Nashville's image. In recent years, the city famous for its country music industry has also attracted hundreds of international companies and seen a surge of legal and illegal immigrants from Latin America, Africa and Asia.

At the same time, it has strived to market itself in a more cosmopolitan way: About five years ago, Nashville changed its nickname from "Music City U.S.A." to "Music City" -- because "the 'USA' seemed to link us more with the 'Hee Haw' brand," explained Butch Spyridon, the Nashville Convention and Visitors Bureau president.


On Friday, Spyridon was one of a number of public officials who cheered the defeat of the English-only measure, saying it was "not who we are as a city, or as a community. . . . It's a creative community, and it's a diverse community."

Business owners like Tom Oreck concurred. "One of my great concerns about this was the message it would send -- one that took down the 'welcome' sign and put up a 'go away' sign," said Oreck, chairman of Nashville-based Oreck Corp., the vacuum-cleaner manufacturer. "I feel that that could have really hurt Nashville's ability to grow in a healthy fashion."

Nashvillians have been debating the merits of an English-only law since Sept. 2006, when Eric Crafton, a member of the city-county council, introduced the idea in a bill. In 2007, Crafton told the Times he was motivated by "pent-up frustrations" over illegal immigration. He also said he wanted to encourage immigrants to learn English, and save money by having government business conducted in one language.

The bill was approved by the council in 2007, but was vetoed by then-Mayor Bill Purcell, who said it would make the city "less safe, less friendly and less successful."

The idea was resuscitated as a ballot measure that would have amended the city-county charter so that all meetings and communications were in English. It allowed the council to make exceptions "to protect public health and safety."

On Thursday, voters rejected the measure by a count of 41,752 to 32,144, in the largest turnout for a special election in more than a decade, according to Ray Barrett, elections administrator for Davidson County.

The measure was opposed by some of the most powerful forces in town -- including the Chamber of Commerce, the Visitors Bureau, church leaders and the current mayor, Karl Dean.

Some opponents argued that the law would punish not only illegal immigrants, but the large number of legal refugees from Somalia and Iraqi Kurdistan who have changed the flavor of the city in recent years.

They also pointed out that city legal experts said the measure, if passed, may have run afoul of federal law, and entangled the city in costly lawsuits.

Another turnoff for some voters: the election cost the city between $270,000 and $300,000, according to Barrett.

Anthony Roberts, a real estate agent, said he voted for the measure, but was upset about the expense.

"I'm for the English first," he said, "But I wasn't for the special election."

A number of opponents spoke Friday about the defeat as a bullet dodged for the business community.

John Butler, the Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce's vice president for international business, noted that 206 foreign-owned companies were operating in the area, providing about 34,000 jobs. Their presence -- in addition to help from a robust healthcare industry -- helped the metro area avoid a net job loss last year. (Butler said metro Nashville gained 3,300 jobs from January to November of 2008, a .4 increase from the same period in 2007).

Many of the companies are Japanese and German auto parts firms that set up shop in recent years to supply the car factories that have sprung up across the Southeast. These days, Butler said, Nashville is courting Chinese manufacturers, and has a leg up on other cities, because even the Chinese know Nashville for its music.

"But then you start to sour that with English-only, and all the connotations that brings," he said.

Crafton, the main backer of the measure, could not be reached for comment for this article. But in an interview with the Tennessean newspaper on Thursday, he appeared to be giving up on the idea: "Like Roberto Duran said after his fight, 'No mas,' " he said.


latimes.com/




"Taking back America one community at a time!"
The Greater Cincinnatti Tri-State Area F.I.R.E. Coalition Team!
http://www.firecoalition.com

"Put Americans First America!"
Stand Up and Fight For Our Country!
http://www.americansfirstamerica.blogspot.com

"Stop Criminal Immigration in America!"
Report to Deport!
http://www.fugitivehunter.org/usmostwanted


Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.364 seconds.